- This topic has 20 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 4 hours, 41 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
-
19% is a lot less than 95% Maybe this is why the Pfizer ceo sold most of his stock?
Considering that the dishonest “powers that be” use suspected cases to keep this casedemic going, turn about is fair play. Lol.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202101/1212746.shtml
+5
-
Nearly one in a thousand. Good odds for the lottery. Bad for the vaxxx.
https://mobile.twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1349798503464230915
+4 -
-
-
-
arthur- do you have a link i can use to get to that video of firefighter mask test? i’d like to send it to family- i knew enough from other stuff that it’s not going to really protect them from covid, but now i’m really concerned about their health…thanks for posting, now i know it’s not all in my head that i can’t breathe well w/ a mask on!
+7
-
Ahhh…bitchute works a little differently.
Here you go on brandnewtube:
It is also on you tube. Well, at least for now. You can do a search on: “Firefighter ends mask debate once and for all.”
+6
-
-
Please see links below to 2 articles on masks and oxygen levels.
Also, this person was not measuring his blood oxygen level at the same time with a pulse oximeter device (clips on the end of your finger).
Thanks.
Joan
<p style=”text-align: right;”>https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20201103/dont-believe-the-myth-face-masks-dont-lower-oxygen-levels#1</p>
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/07/video-presents-flawed-test-on-masks-oxygen-levels/+2 -
Mask wearing for long periods of time is detrimental to your health. Studies have clearly shown that it lowers your blood oxygen level. (At least for N95 masks which are the only ones that supposedly grant you effective protection from the coronovirus) It also compromises your immune system.
+6 -
I’ll show some personal bias here based on what I consider a healthy skepticism about studies. I will personally remain way more than suspicious about claims that masks are completely harmless to everyone’s health.
Regarding the first link you posted, Joan, that was published by WebMD about a study done by McMaster University of Canada. That’s in paragraph 5. McMaster University of Canada evidently receives some funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. See https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database/Grants/2015/06/OPP1129405. Maybe some bias? Color me suspicious.
Regarding the second link you gave that was published by FactCheck.org, the content might suggest bias since according to https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/2104053/posts the headline of that article reads QUOTE “FactCheck.org is Sponsored by Decidedly LEFTIST Organization: ANNENBERG Public Policy Foundation” UNQUOTE Check that out. Again color me suspicious.
Who knows?
+8 -
Normal masks do not protect against the coronovirus. Only N95 masks, supposedly do.
Studies have been done that show that N95 masks do indeed lower oxygen levels. I do wonder if that contributes to the hundreds of thousands of medical error deaths every year in the USA?
Anyway, we can see from Event 201 that the “medical experts” emphasized the importance of controlling the narrative and flooding the zone with their disinformation.
The participants are then asked the following; how much control of information should there be, who should control this information and how false information can be challenged?
Here is a quote from Matthew Harrington of Edelman (8 minutes 54 seconds):
“We are at a moment where the social media platforms have to step forward and recognize the moment to assert that they are a technology platform and not a broadcaster is over. They, in fact, have to be a participant in broadcasting accurate information and partnering with the scientific and health communities to counterweight if not flood the zone of accurate information because to try to put the genie back in the bottle with the misinformation and disinformation is neigh impossible.”
https://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2020/03/controlling-pandemic-narrative.html?m=1
+6 -
-
-
-
Thank you, TR. You are very kind.
Well, I don’t know everything. I suppose I know very little. Especially of science. I do look forward to learning about it in eternity, though. :)
It is hard to really know what is going on as the enemy as muddied the waters so much. One scientist says one thing and another, the complete opposite.
Sorry if I seemed snarky, Joan. That wasn’t my intent. :(
I suppose I have a bias when I see small children wearing masks or even babies. That really troubles me. The worst I saw was pictures of children in Africa with cardboard on their face tied together with string. That made me very angry.
Anyway, Jesus is coming soon to clean house! Can’t wait!
+4 -
-
-
yes, i am very concerned with all of this covid stuff they are making children do & not do…i hate it- can’t even think about the affects it’s all having and will have…personally nieces and nephews i cringe to think of how this hurts them…i have to just be numb about it and pray for the Rapture of every precious child extremely soon (& even the domestic, dependent animals/pets)
+3 -
I heard from a friend in Ontario how she had a newborn that was only 2 months old. She took her into a shop. The newborn was babbling and burbling and seemed delighted with life. The shopkeeper said, “I wish your baby could see how happy she is making me. I’ve got a big smile on my face. Could I pull my mask down for just a minute to show her.”
The mother consented. When the shopkeeper did, the baby started crying. The baby hadn’t been out much with the lockdown and was not used to seeing unmasked faces and it scared her.
I shudder to think of the children that are being normalized to this very abnormal situation. :(
I firmly believe children will be raptured. Romans 7:9 speaks to an age of accountability and David’s life story indicates that his child went to heaven. As for pet animals, I really hope so.
+5
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.